The New Politics

David Schurman Wallace

I don’t remember what

we learned in school: to weave

a net was not in our lesson plan,

nor a healing touch, nor a sense

that the wetlands and the trees

would pass away and never

flower again even in memory.

Help me: I still want to know.

Brought over a kumquat tree

to your house yesterday, you

weren’t there. The water

table won’t sustain our needs

when salt gets into everything.

I remember the heron waiting

for what I don’t understand.

Blue shading to gray beneath

the fierce car-exhaust dusk.

It is difficult to believe that

we will be cured by speaking

more clearly about our failure,

even if everyone says so.

I waited for you to call me.

Cognitive decline is already

beginning even as we reach

up into star-tangles to try

to say what is still unbounded.

For the first time unafraid, or

still afraid but rushing through.

Dirt in my nails. The crisis

means for now that no crisis

strikes me in this residence:

the emulation of an instant

of being there under a bough

with you, unrolling the years

and rolling them back up

tighter than ever, until phase

changes, blood into vapor,

carbon into gem, charged

lumps of matter we put away

in shadowy corners when we

can’t find the correct use.

In summer I was telepathic

with the possibility of red.

Down the dead train track

I went whistling, every inch

of me humming with pleasure

for how living might unfurl.

I haven’t felt so much that way

lately. There is a new insect

that covers over everything—

it has strength without joy.

I’m standing outside your house

watching the grass that has

lost its echo, wondering

if you’ll repaint the door.

My mother is already throwing

away her possessions so there

will be less mess. I have been

a good student, and it counted

for nothing. On the Fourth

I crept into the ocean at night—

it was colder than intelligence—

and watched the fireworks

that got smaller each second

even as the noise grew.


what surprised you about the composition of this poem?

When I start a poem, I don’t want to know what I’m saying too quickly. It can kill the fun to recognize your “point” too soon—so many poems give away the gist long before you reach the end. So it surprised me when this poem’s opening came very “logically,” with something resembling that old-fashioned term of rhetoric, an “argument.” What, really, are we doing this all for? Why do we struggle so hard to improve ourselves when the world is degraded and the worth of our contributions feels obscure at best? Fortunately for me, I don’t know the answer. Later, there are some bigger leaps between images and ideas (despite everything getting scrunched into one long flow), but I wanted to trust that the poem enacts the mystery of learning, and that the intuitive and unintuitive can share elbow room in the fog.
David Schurman Wallace is a writer living in New York City.
Originally published:
March 12, 2025

Featured

Searching for Seamus Heaney

What I found when I resolved to read him
Elisa Gonzalez

What Happened When I Began to Speak Welsh

By learning my family's language, I hoped to join their conversation.
Dan Fox

When Does a Divorce Begin?

Most people think of it as failure. For me it was an achievement.
Anahid Nersessian

You Might Also Like

Nothing Is a Memory

Remembering Bernadette Mayer
Daniel Poppick


The Potato Plants

Jodie Hollander

A Literary Gift in Print

Give a year of The Yale Review—four beautifully printed issues featuring new literature and ideas.
Give a Subscription